I grant the points of FCH and it was well written if a bit rambling - Thirith mentioned that tendency. It goes off on a few tangents and kind of concludes as I might - it’s still a good game but not a revolution either. He’s got a similar overall opinion to Jim Sterling. I don’t know if it’s “realism” or redundant detail that people have trouble with. I was quite happy to flick through catalog pages in the shops or just find what I wanted on the shelves. It’s a bit hard to sustain the realism argument when Arthur can down a tin of baked beans and strawberries in two seconds. It’s more - where do you put the detail to create the feeling of immersion. Do we need the horse poop and simulated testicles?