I'd be very interested in discussing your thoughts on it, or any discussions you've found interesting. Personally I am against AI generation in general not only because of obvious possibility of abuse but also because the quality is clearly inferior. It'll usher an age of mediocre media made by producers instead of artists, which is in part what the SAGA strikes are about in Hollywood. The content being pumped by those than own the distribution medias already feels like it was created by algorithms only. Souless and boring, churned out in a digital conveior belt.
But I think I'm okay with it in cases like FMs using Garrett's voice: no one is being more hurt than if you took some of the textures and made similar new ones with the use of an AI model. But those are my initial thoughts on the matter. I'd reconsider in an instant if there was a chance Stephen Russell was back on the job, for example.
I can't even see why someone would make such a claim. I think the misuse is the same that it is in all of AI generation: 1) deceit, 2) put people out of work, 3) lower quality of work, 4) empowering producers and capitalists instead of artists