TTLG|Jukebox|Thief|Bioshock|System Shock|Deus Ex|Mobile
Page 4 of 25 FirstFirst 123456789141924 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 615

Thread: US Election Thread 2024

  1. #76
    Member
    Registered: May 2004
    Location: Canuckistan GWN
    Oh. Is this to make amends for the Children's Charity which tRump robbed blind to buy himself flattering paintings to hang in his private golf clubs?

    This will be like tRumps eternal Infrastructure Week. Always next week, never this week. "jam yesterday, jam tomorrow but never jam today"

    At least Inmate 45 will have plenty of time to do charity work from his prison cell.

  2. #77
    Member
    Registered: May 2004
    Location: Canuckistan GWN
    Meanwhile: Fund-Raiser for Jan. 6 Defendants Will Be Held at Trump’s Golf Club

    The event — billed as the J6 Awards Gala and hosted by the Stand in the Gap Foundation — is scheduled to take place at the golf club on Sept. 5, according to an online announcement, with tickets costing up to $50,000 for a table for 12. The money is being raised to pay for legal fees for those being prosecuted for their roles on Jan. 6, when a mob stormed the Capitol to protest Mr. Trump’s loss in the 2020 election.
    Nothing treasonous here, folks. Move along. Move along.

  3. #78
    Member
    Registered: Jan 2001
    Location: the Sheeple Pen
    Hey Vae, you can stop pretending and drop that "trolling" act already. No one believes that you're a "neutral observer" or whatever you used to claim. I kind of wish that your communist comment was sarcasm, but you folks genuinely seem obsessed with communism, which I always find really odd, because there aren't even that many left-leaning politicians in US politics. Kamabla is not one of them.

  4. #79
    Member
    Registered: Jan 2024
    Location: Egyptian Afterlife
    I Wonder about something, Obama cannot go for a third term, is that correct?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty...s_Constitution

    Too bad this is not what happens in Russia, or Venezuela.

  5. #80
    Member
    Registered: May 2004
    Did you see the last Republican plan for health care that they cooked up when they actually tried to put their policies on the paper and didn't just make vague promises that their health care plan was going to be the greatest ever seen? In the end, it was a massive love letter to big pharma and the insurance companies, predicted to become one of the biggest wealth transfers in the history of the US.

    How does slashing even the meager social programs US has help children? How does taking away people's health care and kicking children off their parents' plan help children? Last time Republicans tried to take people's health care away, there were massive protests against this, even among their own supporters, but they didn't care one lick and went ahead with it anyway. And they would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn't for McCain taking a principled stance at the very end of his life.

    Meanwhile, Brandon has actually lifted children out of poverty with the child tax credit, over fierce opposition from the Republicans. Democrats are the only ones who are even willing to talk about things like that, things that help families with children, especially the wing of the party that is little less right to the centre. Not just health care but child care in general, education, postpartum support of mothers, etc. Democrats are the actual pro-life party in the US.

  6. #81
    Member
    Registered: May 2004
    Harris pretty much nailed her speech at the DNC. She seems like a completely different person from when she ran for the 2020 election:


  7. #82
    Member
    Registered: May 2004
    Btw, before endorsing Lord Dampnut, RFK Jr had this to say:


  8. #83
    Member
    Registered: May 2004
    Location: Canuckistan GWN
    FOX is doing the same thing. Last week RFK was an extreme leftist, extreme environmentalist and an enemy of the USA. Now that RFK wears the MAGA cult face paint (brown nose with orange cheek patches) he's the best thing since the last best thing.

    VAE, does this mean you were wrong and Bobby = good?







    I am in AWE of RFK...
    Buahahahahaha. The comments are golden, tinged with faeces.
    Last edited by Nicker; 24th Aug 2024 at 16:40.

  9. #84
    Member
    Registered: Sep 2001
    Location: The other Derry
    Scorned conspiracy theorists band together

  10. #85
    Member
    Registered: May 2004
    Location: Canuckistan GWN
    Breaking News from FOX: Multiple former Republican White House lawyers endorse Kamala Harris and condemn tRump.

    "We endorse Kamala Harris and support her election as President because we believe that returning former President Trump to office would threaten American democracy and undermine the rule of law in our country," the lawyers wrote in a letter that the signatories shared first with Fox News Digital.

    The letter was released on Friday, the day after Harris delivered her nomination acceptance speech in the culminating moment of the Democratic National Convention, which was held in Chicago.


    The list of signatories to the letter, besides Luttig, includes (in alphabetical order) John B. Bellinger III, Senior Associate Counsel to the President and Legal Adviser to the NSC under George W. Bush, Phillip D. Brady, Deputy Counsel to the President under Reagan, Benedict S. Cohen, Associate Counsel to the President under Reagan, Peter D. Keisler, Associate Counsel to the President under Reagan, and Robert M. Kruger, Associate Counsel to the President under Reagan.

    Also included are John M. Mitnick, Associate Counsel to the President and Deputy Counsel, White House Homeland Security Council under George W. Bush, Alan Charles Raul, Associate Counsel to the President under Reagan and General Counsel, OMB under Reagan and George H.W. Bush, Nicholas Rostow, Special Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs and Legal Adviser to the NSC under Reagan and George H.W. Bush, Peter J. Rusthoven, Associate Counsel to the President under Reagan, David B. Waller, Senior Associate Counsel to the President under Reagan, and Wendell L. Willkie II, Associate Counsel to the President under Reagan.
    Last edited by Nicker; 26th Aug 2024 at 18:00.

  11. #86
    Moderator
    Registered: Jan 2003
    Location: NeoTokyo
    I don't know how to embed Twit videos here, and they need to put this on their YouTube channel...
    But there should be more of these "obvious insight" explainers.
    Look for the red flags.

    https://x.com/MeidasTouch/status/1828560908731457881


    I'd already studied personality disorders from way back, so Trump was an obvious case for me since around the early 2000s. It's still stunning that there are people that haven't gotten the memo.

  12. #87
    Member
    Registered: May 2004
    Location: Canuckistan GWN
    Thanks dema: Look for the Red Flags.





    In the case of DJT trying to overturn the 2020 election, Jack Smith ignores all evidence which might be challenged under the SCOTUS "presidential immunity" ruling, convenes a new grand jury and issues a superseding indictment of all four original charges against Defendant 45. He also trimmed the document from 45 pages to 36, making the same case with 80% less verbiage.


    Shit, meet fan. With all the money tRump will save on bronzer, he could hire an actual lawyer.


    Last edited by Nicker; 28th Aug 2024 at 01:32.

  13. #88
    Member
    Registered: Sep 2001
    Location: The other Derry
    Quote Originally Posted by demagogue View Post
    I don't know how to embed Twit videos here, and they need to put this on their YouTube channel...
    But there should be more of these "obvious insight" explainers.
    Look for the red flags.

    https://x.com/MeidasTouch/status/1828560908731457881

    I'd already studied personality disorders from way back, so Trump was an obvious case for me since around the early 2000s. It's still stunning that there are people that haven't gotten the memo.
    LOL. It's a shame that's too long for a TV ad buy.

  14. #89
    Yikes, the Harris internal polling must not be looking good.

  15. #90
    Member
    Registered: May 2004
    Location: Canuckistan GWN
    tRumps very public, blatant and frankly stupid criminality is a matter of fact, not your own internal polling.

    Still "objectively" rooting for the rapist. Says a lot about you, Phreaky.

  16. #91
    Member
    Registered: May 2004
    I don't know about internal polling, but the external polling is not looking bad for Harris:
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarador...st-dnc-survey/

  17. #92
    Member
    Registered: May 2004
    If anyone has any doubts about which kind of people Lord Dampnut would staff his administration with, you only have to look back at the kinds of people he staffed his administration with:

    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine...ouncil/679566/

    Kash Patel was dangerous. On this both Trump appointees and career officials could agree.

    A 40-year-old lawyer with little government experience, he joined the administration in 2019 and rose rapidly. Each new title set off new alarms.

    [...]

    Who was this man, and why did so many top officials fear him?

    It wasn’t a question of ideology. He wasn’t a zealot like Stephen Miller, trying to make the bureaucracy yield to his agenda. Rather, Patel appeared singularly focused on pleasing Trump. Even in an administration full of loyalists, Patel was exceptional in his devotion.

    This was what seemed to disturb many of his colleagues the most: Patel was dangerous, several of them told me, not because of a certain plan he would be poised to carry out if given control of the CIA or FBI, but because he appeared to have no plan at all—his priorities today always subject to a mercurial president’s wishes tomorrow. (Patel disputes this characterization.)

    What wouldn’t a person like that do, if asked?

    [...]

    Patel was ultimately denied a role at the pinnacle of the national-security establishment, but Trump has promised to learn from his mistakes. Should he return to the White House, there will be no Milleys, Haspels, or even Barrs to restrain him as he seeks revenge against his political enemies. Instead, there will be Patels—those whose true faith and allegiance belong not to a nation, but to one man.

    “Get ready, Kash,” Trump said before a gala of young Republicans this past December. “Get ready.”

    [...]

    Patel has a talent for casting himself as the ultimate hero or the unjustly persecuted. I have wondered if this is why he chose not to include in his book the events of October 30, 2020—if, in the end, not even he could figure out a way to make himself the martyr of the story.

    On that Friday, according to multiple reported accounts, SEAL Team 6 was awaiting the Pentagon’s green light on a rescue mission in West Africa. The day before, the administration had learned where gunmen were holding Philip Walton, a 27-year-old American who had been kidnapped that week from his farm near Niger’s border with Nigeria. As multiple agencies now coordinated on final details for the evening operation, the State Department worked to resolve the last outstanding task—securing airspace permission from Nigerian officials. Around noon, Patel called the Pentagon with an update: Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, he said, had gotten the approval. The mission was a go.

    The SEALs were close to landing in Nigeria when Defense Secretary Mark Esper discovered that the State Department had not, in fact, secured the overflight clearance, as Patel had claimed. The aircraft were quickly diverted, flying in circles for the next hour as officials scrambled to alert the Nigerian government to their position. With the operation window narrowing, Esper and Pompeo called the Situation Room to put the decision to the president: Either they abort the mission and risk their hostage being killed, or they proceed into foreign airspace and risk their soldiers being shot down.

    But then, suddenly, the deputy secretary of state was on the line, Esper later wrote in his memoir: They’d been cleared.

    Soon Walton was reunited with his family.

    What had happened?

    Celebratory feelings gave way to anger as officials tried to make sense of Patel’s bad report. According to Esper, Pompeo claimed that at no point had he even spoken with Patel about the mission, much less told him he’d received the airspace rights. Esper wrote that his team suspected that Patel had simply “made the approval story up.”

    Anthony Tata, the Pentagon official and retired Army general to whom Patel had originally given the green light, confronted Patel in a rage. “You could’ve gotten these guys killed!” Tata shouted, according to two people familiar with the exchange. “What the fuck were you thinking?”

    Patel’s response was: “If nobody got hurt, who the fuck cares?”
    [...]

  18. #93
    Member
    Registered: Aug 2008
    Location: behind your second eyelids
    Why can't we all just get along? Let's celebrate life instead


  19. #94
    Member
    Registered: Aug 2004
    There is no bottom with you people, is there? Absolutely nothing you wouldn't stoop to.

    EDIT: Also, weird AF.
    Last edited by Pyrian; 29th Aug 2024 at 16:03.

  20. #95
    Member
    Registered: May 2004
    Location: Canuckistan GWN
    Even AI can't make tRump look normal. It's as if creepiness is integral native to his algorithms.

    Nice gel nails though.

  21. #96
    Member
    Registered: Dec 2020
    I'm probably late to this party, but it's amazing these guys back him after this stuff:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...r-much-better/

    Former president Donald Trump has sparked a sharp backlash among veterans and Democrats by saying that an award recognizing civilian contributions to society is “much better” than one bestowed on members of the military because many of those who receive that award are wounded or killed in combat.
    So the Medal of Honor is a joke because of the losers who get it, who stupidly got themselves killed protecting their country. What chumps. Trump really has a distorted sense of reality since to him this was a totally reasonable opinion to hold.

    Then because of the backlash to this, he held a photo op at Arlington National Cemetary, and his goons had to beat up the workers there who tried to stop them photographing the gravestones, which is an offense. There's a pattern there, similar to how his guys literally tear-gassed priests so he could take a photo op at a famous church. I guess when you're not in office you can't bring tear gas.

  22. #97
    Member
    Registered: Jan 2024
    Location: Egyptian Afterlife
    Now I am wounded, I was in the military for a couple of years.

  23. #98
    Member
    Registered: May 2004
    To be fair, they only beat up like one worker and it was more like a scuffle where they pushed her to the ground or something.

    Looks like he had fun, though:


  24. #99
    Member
    Registered: May 2004
    Location: Canuckistan GWN
    What greater joy can a psychopath have than laughing at the dead? Stealing from dying children pales by comparison.

  25. #100
    Member
    Registered: Sep 2001
    Location: The other Derry
    "I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters, OK?"

    Turning out to be true.

Page 4 of 25 FirstFirst 123456789141924 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •